Writers expecting compensation from Anthropic's $1.5 billion copyright settlement say they have begun receiving notices that other parties are also claiming a share of their payouts.
The settlement follows a class-action case tied to the use of copyrighted books in AI training. After final approval in July, payments are now moving ahead for nearly 500,000 titles, with each pirated work valued at $3,000 under the agreement.
The payout structure depends on publishing status. If a book remains in print with a traditional publisher, the amount is split evenly between author and publisher. If the title is self-published, or if rights have already reverted to the author, the full payment is meant to go to the writer.
Some authors, however, say the claims process is producing unexpected results. Mystery and thriller writer April Henry said one of her reverted books was claimed by a publisher that no longer held the rights. Other writers have reported similar patterns, including claims from publishers on books they no longer control and requests for the full payment when only half should apply.
Industry observers say the issue may stem from recordkeeping problems and a complicated claims system rather than intentional overreach. The Authors Guild has also outlined steps for authors to challenge incorrect allocations, especially in cases where rights reverted before the settlement's August 10, 2022 download date.
As the process continues, the dispute highlights how AI-era licensing and copyright systems are still being refined. The outcome could help shape clearer standards for creative compensation in the future.
